Часовщик (chasovschik) wrote,
Часовщик
chasovschik

Durban

Совершенно ослепительная бумага: черновик итогового документа конференции в Дурбане. Ооновские бюрократы делают вид, что затея с глобальным потеплением еще жива, и предлагают всем какие-то неимоверные мероприятия, основываясь на давно заплеванном AR4. Например, развитым странам предлагается сократить выбросы CO2 за тридцать лет не менее чем на 100%. Или защита прав Матери-Земли там предполагается, дословно, без шуток. Ничего из этого, естественно, не выйдет, дураков нет в такое ввязываться, но почитать это весьма поучительно – просто чтобы представлять, ради каких масштабов контроля затевалась вся паника.

Под катом – краткое изложение содержимого в исполнении лорда Монктона с его комментариями. Ежели у кого есть сомнения в точности известного скептика Монктона, добро пожаловать по первой ссылке на официальный сайт конференции.

• A new International Climate Court will have the power to compel Western nations to pay ever-larger sums to third-world countries in the name of making reparation for supposed “climate debt”. The Court will have no power over third-world countries. Here and throughout the draft, the West is the sole target. “The process” is now irredeemably anti-Western.

• “Rights of Mother Earth”: The draft, which seems to have been written by feeble-minded green activists and environmental extremists, talks of “The recognition and defence of the rights of Mother Earth to ensure harmony between humanity and nature”. Also, “there will be no commodification [whatever that may be: it is not in the dictionary and does not deserve to be] of the functions of nature, therefore no carbon market will be developed with that purpose”.

• “Right to survive”: The draft childishly asserts that “The rights of some Parties to survive are threatened by the adverse impacts of climate change, including sea level rise.” At 2 inches per century, according to eight years’ data from the Envisat satellite? Oh, come off it! The Jason 2 satellite, the new kid on the block, shows that sea-level has actually dropped over the past three years.

• War and the maintenance of defence forces and equipment are to cease – just like that – because they contribute to climate change. There are other reasons why war ought to cease, but the draft does not mention them.

• A new global temperature target will aim, Canute-like, to limit “global warming” to as little as 1 C° above pre-industrial levels. Since temperature is already 3 C° above those levels, what is in effect being proposed is a 2 C° cut in today’s temperatures. This would take us halfway back towards the last Ice Age, and would kill hundreds of millions. Colder is far more dangerous than warmer.

• The new CO2 emissions target, for Western countries only, will be a reduction of up to 50% in emissions over the next eight years and of “more than 100%” [these words actually appear in the text] by 2050. So, no motor cars, no coal-fired or gas-fired power stations, no aircraft, no trains. Back to the Stone Age, but without even the right to light a carbon-emitting fire in your caves. Windmills, solar panels and other “renewables” are the only alternatives suggested in the draft. There is no mention of the immediate and rapid expansion of nuclear power worldwide to prevent near-total economic destruction.

• The new CO2 concentration target could be as low as 300 ppmv CO2 equivalent (i.e., including all other greenhouse gases as well as CO2 itself). That is a cut of almost half compared with the 560 ppmv CO2 equivalent today. It implies just 210 ppmv of CO2 itself, with 90 ppmv CO2 equivalent from other greenhouse gases. But at 210 ppmv, plants and trees begin to die. CO2 is plant food. They need a lot more of it than 210 ppmv.

• The peak-greenhouse-gas target year – for the West only – will be this year. We will be obliged to cut our emissions from now on, regardless of the effect on our economies (and the lack of effect on the climate).

• The West will pay for everything, because of its “historical responsibility” for causing “global warming”. Third-world countries will not be obliged to pay anything. But it is the UN, not the third-world countries, that will get the money from the West, taking nearly all of it for itself as usual. There is no provision anywhere in the draft for the UN to publish accounts of how it has spent the $100 billion a year the draft demands that the West should stump up from now on.

Mirrored from Gears and Springs.

Tags: global warming
Subscribe

  • Вести с полей гендерных битв

    Две ссылки для иллюстрации последнего достижения левых в жанре divide et impera. Раз - письмо в WaPo про то, как авторша ненавидит всех мужчин.…

  • Мнение Эксперта

    A victim’s testimony is legally sufficient evidence by itself to convict someone of sexual assault. No other evidence is required.…

  • Кавано всё

    Точно по сценарию с Анитой Хилл на сцене появилась обвинительница Кавано - говорит, поняла, что анонимность сохранить не удастся, и теперь желает…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 2 comments