Professor Johnson, Professor and Director of the Program on Law, Environment and Economy at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, who expressed surprise that the case for global warming was so weak, systematically examined the claims made in IPCC publications and other similar work by leading climate establishment scientists and compared them with what is found in the peer-edited climate science literature. He found that the climate establishment does not follow the scientific method. Instead, it “seems overall to comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined policy preference.”
Опубликовано в Записках Часовщика. Комментировать там больше нельзя, все комментарии просьба оставлять тут.