Часовщик (chasovschik) wrote,
Часовщик
chasovschik

Подтверждения

Glenn Greenwald пишет по поводу очередной клеветы, которую Голдберг опубликовал у себя в Атлантике, и особенно по поводу ее "подтверждений" в других местах:

So we have anonymous sources making claims on one side, and Trump and former aides (including Bolton, now a harsh Trump critic) insisting that the story is inaccurate. Beyond deciding whether or not to believe Goldberg’s story based on what best advances one’s political interests, how can one resolve the factual dispute? If other media outlets could confirm the original claims from Goldberg, that would obviously be a significant advancement of the story.

Other media outlets — including Associated Press and Fox News — now claim that they did exactly that: “confirmed” the Atlantic story. But if one looks at what they actually did, at what this “confirmation” consists of, it is the opposite of what that word would mean, or should mean, in any minimally responsible sense. AP, for instance, merely claims that “a senior Defense Department official with firsthand knowledge of events and a senior U.S. Marine Corps officer who was told about Trump’s comments confirmed some of the remarks to The Associated Press,” while Fox merely said “a former senior Trump administration official who was in France traveling with the president in November 2018 did confirm other details surrounding that trip.”

In other words, all that likely happened is that the same sources who claimed to Jeffrey Goldberg, with no evidence, that Trump said this went to other outlets and repeated the same claims — the same tactic that enabled MSNBC and CBS to claim they had “confirmed” the fundamentally false CNN story about Trump Jr. receiving advanced access to the WikiLeaks archive. Or perhaps it was different sources aligned with those original sources and sharing their agenda who repeated these claims. Given that none of the sources making these claims have the courage to identify themselves, due to their fear of mean tweets, it is impossible to know.

But whatever happened, neither AP nor Fox obtained anything resembling “confirmation.”


Он там приводит только один пример такой же херни. А ведь мы четыре года читаем такие откровения пару раз в неделю в среднем, и давно знаем, чем они всегда заканчиваются. Это ж каким безмозглым говном, совершенно спятившим от ненависти к Трампу, надо быть, чтобы до сих пор старательно вестись на такие вещи.

Re-mirrored to LJ from Dreamwidth.

comment count unavailable comments are already there, and you can comment there using OpenID.

Tags: 2020 president election, media, trump
Subscribe

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • "What Does the New Mask Guidance Really Mean?"

    CDC выдала очередные рекомендации: теперь вакцинированным можно без маски. Но только там, где начальство разрешает. Science, bitch! Fully…

  • Ссылка на память

    Требования BLM к окружающему миру, без комментариев. 1. Convict and ban Trump from future political office: We are joining Rep. Ilhan Omar, Rep.…

  • Битва двух якодзун

    Администрация Байдена по многочисленным просьбам трудящихся собралась запрещать ментоловые сигареты. Из ACLU им сообщили, что это будет расизм и…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 26 comments

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • "What Does the New Mask Guidance Really Mean?"

    CDC выдала очередные рекомендации: теперь вакцинированным можно без маски. Но только там, где начальство разрешает. Science, bitch! Fully…

  • Ссылка на память

    Требования BLM к окружающему миру, без комментариев. 1. Convict and ban Trump from future political office: We are joining Rep. Ilhan Omar, Rep.…

  • Битва двух якодзун

    Администрация Байдена по многочисленным просьбам трудящихся собралась запрещать ментоловые сигареты. Из ACLU им сообщили, что это будет расизм и…