Часовщик (chasovschik) wrote,
Часовщик
chasovschik

Скандал в благородном семействе

Пишут, что в цитадели борьбы с изменением климата, NOAA, завелся whistleblower. Да как свистнул!

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.

His disclosures are likely to stiffen President Trump’s determination to enact his pledges to reverse his predecessor’s ‘green’ policies, and to withdraw from the Paris deal – so triggering an intense political row.

,,,

In an exclusive interview, Dr Bates accused the lead author of the paper, Thomas Karl, who was until last year director of the NOAA section that produces climate data – the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) – of ‘insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximised warming and minimised documentation… in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming pause, rushed so that he could time publication to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy’.

Не может быть! Кто бы мог подумать, а.

Mirrored from Gears and Springs.

Re-mirrored to LJ from Dreamwidth.

comment count unavailable comments are already there, and you can comment there using OpenID.

Tags: global warming
Subscribe

  • Про кракена

    Sidney Powell подала-таки обещанные иски в Мичигане и Джорджии. Пресса освещает событие по существу, отмечая самое главное: все хором рассказывают,…

  • Бессмысленные цифры

    Rasmussen утверждает, что не только три четверти республиканцев верят в кражу выборов, но и почти треть демократов. Забавно. При этом большинство…

  • Некоторые перспективы

    When asked who had "rightfully won," more than half (52 percent) of Republican respondents said Trump, compared with less than a third (29…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 15 comments

  • Про кракена

    Sidney Powell подала-таки обещанные иски в Мичигане и Джорджии. Пресса освещает событие по существу, отмечая самое главное: все хором рассказывают,…

  • Бессмысленные цифры

    Rasmussen утверждает, что не только три четверти республиканцев верят в кражу выборов, но и почти треть демократов. Забавно. При этом большинство…

  • Некоторые перспективы

    When asked who had "rightfully won," more than half (52 percent) of Republican respondents said Trump, compared with less than a third (29…